ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic and duty hour restrictions have illuminated a role for surgical simulation in trainees that permits meaningful technical experience outside the operating room. There is a need for the implementation of surgical simulation infrastructure adjacent to clinical training with practical considerations for complexity and cost. This systematic review analyzes surgical simulations that train hand surgical techniques and procedures with subjective or objective competency assessment. Method(s): A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA- P guidelines using the PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Selected search terms included procedures relevant to the field of hand surgery and various types of simulation training. Data, including skills and techniques taught and assessed, model type, equipment, cost, and emphasis placed in training for each article, were extracted. Result(s): Of 2,519 articles, 40 met inclusion criteria. Models were described as: synthetic benchtop/3D-printed (40.0%), animal (22.5%), cadaveric (20.0%), augmented and virtual reality (AR/ VR;12.5%), and other computer simulation (12.5%). Three models incorporated both a physical benchtop component and an AR/ VR component. The procedures most represented included tendon repair (30.0%), fracture fixation (27.5%), wrist arthroscopy (15.0%), and carpal tunnel release (15.0%). Sixty-five percent of articles emphasized the importance of surgical simulation in a surgeon's training. Conclusion(s): A diversity of surgical simulation models exist for the practice of various aspects of hand surgery. The existing literature demonstrates their utility for increasing expertise with surgical techniques and procedures in a low-risk setting.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: A LSR is a systematic review that is continually updated, incorporating new evidence as it becomes available. They are conducted in research areas where new evidence is constantly emerging on diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcomes. The objective of this study was to understand the current application of LSRs across research areas. Method(s): Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched to identify LSRs. Only the most recent update of a LSR was included. Data regarding the indication, intervention, methods, frequency of updates, and funding were extracted. Result(s): Of the 1,243 records identified, 126 LSRs were included for analysis. The first LSR was published in 2015, with a significant increase in the number of LSRs published starting in 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common indication represented by LSRs was COVID-19 (72%), followed by oncology (10%). Other indications with LSRs included chronic pain, traumatic brain injury, and skin disorders, among others. While most oncology LSRs identified interventional randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) (85%), only 54% of COVID-19 LSRs were restricted to interventional studies, including a combination of RCTS and real-world observational studies. Oncology LSRs included common cancers such as prostate, renal, or multiple myeloma. Of the reviews that reported update frequency, 28% planned monthly, 12% yearly, and 12% weekly updates. Only 46% of LSRs were registered. The majority of LSRs were funded by government or research organizations. Objectives of LSRs varied, with most stating the need to maintain up-to-date databases;however, several studies used LSRs to facilitate network meta-analysis or mixed treatment comparisons. Conclusion(s): While LSRs were introduced over five years ago, their frequency increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Apart from COVID-19, LSRs are commonly used in oncology settings. LSRs provide high-level, relevant, and up-to-date evidence, making them a useful tool for clinical and real-world research.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Telepractice for people with aphasia (PWA) is gaining importance, not least because of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Many PWA are affected by a reduction of quality of life (QoL). Experts recommend focussing on psychosocial impacts more consistently, but the transfer to telepractice has been investigated in a limited number of studies so far. The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of different telepractice approaches on QoL in PWA. The evidence was identified through a broad literature research in five databases and other sources such as Google Scholar and referring papers or was searched by hand. In total, twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. Focus of the analysis was the association between therapeutic approaches and their effects on QoL. Half (n = 6) of the included studies clearly indicated positive effects of the applied methods on QoL. Further analysis showed no definable link between the therapeutic approaches and their impact on QoL. Nevertheless, decisive assumptions about QoL-enhancing telepractice can be derived from the literature. Telepractice in aphasia therapy can improve the patients' QoL. Benefits for QoL do not only depend on the utilised approach. Several factors (e.g., enhancing of communicative confidence) are significant in their impact on QoL and should be examined in future research.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the clinical benefits and potential risks of using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) as a treatment for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Method(s): Relevant studies were identified through searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from January 2020 to December 2022. We included observational studies on adult patients who received venovenous (VV) ECMO support for COVID-19-induced ARDS. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, 3-month mortality, and complications associated with VV ECMO. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 and the metafor and meta packages. Result(s): The final analysis included 39 studies comprising 10,702 patients. In-hospital mortality for adults receiving ECMO was 34.2% (95% CI: 28.5% - 40.3%;I2 = 93%), while the 3-month mortality rate was 50.2% (95% CI: 44.4% - 56.0%;I2 = 51%). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 33.7% of patients (95% CI, 23.9 - 45.1;I2 = 96%). The pooled estimates for other complications were as follows: overall thromboembolic events 40.9% (95% CI, 24.8 - 59.3;I2 = 97%), stroke 8.7% (95% CI, 5.7 - 13.2;I2 = 72%), deep vein thrombosis 15.4% (95% CI, 9.7 - 23.6;I2 = 80%), pulmonary embolism 15.6% (95% CI, 9.3 - 25.1;I2 = 92%), gastrointestinal haemorrhage 8.1% (95% CI, 5.5 - 11.8;I2 = 56%), and the need for any renal replacement therapy in 38.0% of patients (95% CI, 31.6 - 44.8;I2 = 84%). Bacterial pneumonia occurred in 46.4% of patients (95% CI, 32.5 - 61.0;I2 = 96%). Conclusion(s): Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) may be an effective treatment option for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. The use of VV ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital and 3-month mortality. However, bleeding is a common complication that should be closely monitored. Further research is needed to determine the optimal use of VV ECMO in this patient population and to identify factors that may predict a favourable response to treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of ECMO in pediatric COVID-19 patients in terms of mortality rate, rate of successful weaning, and frequency of complications. Method(s): A comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to December 2022. Inclusion criteria for the studies included observational studies and case series with a minimum of five patients that reported on the use of ECMO in children with COVID-19. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 and the metafor and meta packages. Result(s): Seven studies involving a total of 73 pediatric COVID-19 patients who received ECMO were identified. The pooled estimate of mortality in children receiving ECMO was 21.5% (15 out of 73 patients;95% CI: 9.9% to 40.5%;I2 = 14%). The success rate for weaning off/decannulation of ECMO was estimated to be 85.1% (52 out of 61 patients;95% CI, 67.8-93.9;I2 = 1%). The overall complication rate was 32.6% (14 out of 43;95% CI, 20.3-47.7;I2 = 0%). Conclusion(s): The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that ECMO may be an effective treatment option for children with severe COVID-19, particularly those requiring mechanical ventilation. The success rate for weaning off/decannulation of ECMO was estimated to be 85.1%, while the overall complication rate was 32.6%. However, the small sample size and high risk of bias in the included studies should be taken into consideration when interpreting these results. Further research is necessary to confirm the efficacy of ECMO in pediatric COVID-19 patients and determine the optimal use of this treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Meta-analyses have investigated associations between race and ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes. However, there is uncertainty about these associations' existence, magnitude, and level of evidence. We, therefore, aimed to synthesize, quantify, and grade the strength of evidence of race and ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes in the US. Method(s): In this umbrella review, we searched four databases (Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Epistemonikos) from database inception to April 2022. The methodological quality of each meta-analysis was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR-2). The strength of evidence of the associations between race and ethnicity with outcomes was ranked according to established criteria as convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or non-significant. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022336805 Results: Of 880 records screened, we selected seven meta-analyses for evidence synthesis, with 42 associations examined. Overall, 10 of 42 associations were statistically significant (p <= 0.05). Two associations were highly suggestive, two were suggestive, and two were weak, whereas the remaining 32 associations were non-significant. The risk of COVID-19 infection was higher in Black individuals compared to White individuals (risk ratio, 2.08, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.60-2.71), which was supported by highly suggestive evidence;with the conservative estimates from the sensitivity analyses, this association remained suggestive. Among those infected with COVID-19, Hispanic individuals had a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization than non-Hispanic White individuals (odds ratio, 2.08, 95% CI, 1.60-2.70) with highly suggestive evidence which remained after sensitivity analyses. Conclusion(s): Individuals of Black and Hispanic groups had a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization. These associations of race and ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes existed more obviously in the pre-hospitalization stage. More consideration should be given in this stage for addressing health inequity.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective. The prognosis value of fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) in COVID-19 is controversial. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between the FIB-4 index and COVID-19 disease progression. Methods. We performed meta-analysis using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A fixed- or random-effects model was used for evaluating heterogeneity. Results. Thirteen studies were included. The meta-analysis of unadjusted results showed that compared to lower FIB-4 index, patients with higher FIB-4 index had increased odds of mortality (OR=5.1, 95%CI 3.67-7.09;P<0.001), ICU admission (OR=2.32, 95%CI: 1.65-3.25, P<0.00001) and need for mechanical ventilator support (OR=3.51, 95%CI: 2.1-5.85, P<0.001). In addition, the meta-analysis of adjusted results showed patients with higher FIB-4 index was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR=3.01, 95%CI: 2.21-4.09, P<0.001) and need for mechanical ventilator support (OR=3.76, 95%CI: 2.08-6.82, P<0.001) compared to patients with lower FIB-4 index. Conclusion. This meta-analysis indicated that high FIB-4 index score was associated with the severity and mortality in COVID-19 infected patients.Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Clinical Scientists, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Cases of new autoimmune and autoinflammatory conditions have been reported among COVID-19 survivors. A literature review on newonset autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTDs) following infection with COVID-19 is lacking.This systematic literature review aimed to evaluate the potential association between COVID-19 infection and the development of new-onset ACTDs in adults. Methods Articles published until September 2022, investigating the association between COVID-19 infection and new-onset ACTDs were included. The ''population'' searched was patients with disease terms for autoimmune connective tissue diseases, including (but not limited to) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjogren's syndrome, systemic sclerosis (SSc), any idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM), antisynthetase syndrome, mixed CTD and undifferentiated CTD (and related MeSH terms), with ''intervention'' as COVID-19 and related terms. For terms for COVID-19, a dedicated search strategy developed by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence was used.Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, restricted to English-language articles only. Eligible articles were: case reports and series (of any sample size), observational studies, qualitative studies and randomised controlled trials. Patients developing ACTDs without prior COVID-19 or reporting flares of existing ACTDs were excluded. Information was extracted on patient demographics, new ACTDs' onset time, clinical characteristics, COVID-19 and ACTD treatment, and COVID-19 and ACTDs outcomes. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022358750). Results After deduplication, 2239 articles were identified. After screening title and , 2196 papers were excluded, with 43 proceeding to fulltext screening. Ultimately, 28 articles (all single case reports) were included. Of the 28 included patients, 64.3% were female. The mean age was 51.1 years (range 20-89 years). The USA reported the most cases (9/28). ACTD diagnoses comprised: 11 (39.3%) IIM (including 4 cases of dermatomyositis);7 (25%) SLE;4 (14.3%) anti-synthetase syndrome;4 (14.3%) SSc;2 (7.1%) other ACTD (one diagnosed with lupus/MCTD overlap). Of eight, four (14.3%) patients (including that with lupus/MCTD) were diagnosed with lupus nephritis. The average onset time from COVID-19 infection to ACTD diagnosis was 23.7days. A third of the patients were admitted to critical care, one for ACTD treatment for SLE with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (14 sessions of plasmapheresis, rituximab and intravenous corticosteroids) and nine due to COVID-19. The majority (80%) of patients went into remission of ACTD following treatment, while two (10%) patients died- one due to macrophage activation syndrome associated with anti-synthetase syndrome and two from unreported causes. Conclusion Our results suggest a potential association between COVID-19 infection and new-onset ACTDs, predominantly in young females, reflective of wider CTD epidemiology. The aetiology and mechanisms by which ACTDs arise following COVID-19 infection remain unknown and require more robust epidemiological data.
ABSTRACT
Risk factors for severe COVID-19 are also associated with periodontitis. They are smoking, older age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the study was to select and analyze publications that consider a possible relationship between inflammatory periodontal diseases and the severity of COVID-19. Material and methods. The search for publications by the key words was conducted using the electronic databases: Cochrane Library;MEDLINE, eLIBRARY for systematic review. We selected 94 publications, the systematic review included 10 scientific articles presenting the results of randomized trials. Results. The results of the analysis showed the connection between COVID-19 severity and inflammatory periodontal diseases presence. In the patients with severe COVID-19 on the background of periodontitis it was established a high risk for artificial lung ventilation prescription. The course of COVID-19 is possibly depending on high expression of ACE2 receptors in oral mucosal cells and aspiration of pathogenic bacteria from periodontal tissues with saliva on the background of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. The bacterial etiology of periodontitis plays important role of an immunological trigger that causes hyperreaction of humoral and cellular immunity, NETosis activation and NLRP3 inflammation. Conclusion. The presence of periodontitis in patients with overweight and obesity, DM or hypertension may be associated with severe COVID-19 course, possible development of complications and pneumonia.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2023. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
It is now only in the wake of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that we are beginning to understand many of the extra-respiratory manifestations of the condition. There is now growing evidence that erectile dysfunction (ED) is closely linked with the disease. We carry out one of the first literature reviews to consolidate the current evidence of the causal link between COVID-19 and ED and explore the proposed mechanisms that underpin this phenomenon. We carried out a literature search of the databases;PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane library. Search time frame was between December 2019 and March 2022. Only studies deemed of acceptable quality were included. Five studies were found highlighting the link between COVID-19 and ED. A further Nineteen studies were utilized to illustrate the proposed biological mechanisms underpinning COVID-19 related ED. Clear evidence has been documented through multiple studies internationally recognizing reduction in erectile scores and reduced sexual activity. It appears there is likely indirect and direct cytopathic effects on endothelial cells, in addition to hormonal and psychosocial factors. The associated ED is likely a result of a multitude of mechanisms including direct and indirect endothelial dysfunction, vasoactive cytokines, endocrine dysregulation, and psychosocial factors. This is the first literature review to delve into the likely underpinning mechanisms of the virus that drive ED.Copyright ©2023 The Author(s). Published by MRE Press.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of study The efficacy of facemasks in prevention of disease transmission is widely debated with a paucity of underlying evidence. In the face of COVID-19, officials began considering potential benefits of facemask use, such as preventing transmission to others or protecting health care workers interacting with infected individuals. However, the efficacy of facemasks in the context of COVID-19 is not well studied and its impact on transmission has not yet been fully elucidated. Methods used A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library from database inception up until August 2020 to analyze the efficacy of facemasks, regardless of type, on the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in both healthcare and communal settings. Only English language articles were retrieved, and conference proceedings were omitted. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Summary of results Of the 2720 articles that were identified, 27 studies were included based on predetermined criteria. Of these, ten had complete data. Of 1200 subjects, 953 (79.4%) reported wearing masks while 246 (20.5%) did not. Of the 228 (19.0%) who received a positive COVID test, 73 (32.0%) wore masks and 155 (68.0%) did not. Health care settings comprised 829 subjects, 692 (83.5%) reported wearing masks while 136 (16.4%) did not, and 114 (13.8%) received a positive COVID test. Of these, 50 (43.9%) wore masks and 64 (56.1%) did not. In 371 subjects in non health care settings, 261 (70.4%) reported wearing masks while 110 (29.7%) did not. Of these, 114 (30.7%) received a positive COVID test, while 23 (20.2%) wore masks and 91 (79.8%) did not. Conclusions Wearing a facemask was associated with lower COVID-19 rates in both healthcare settings and non-healthcare settings. From the current data, it appears that a lower percentage of healthcare workers tested positive for COVID-19 compared to subjects in non-healthcare settings, regardless of mask usage. Study limitations include limited data regarding the types of mask worn, level of exposure risk, and other personal protective measures taken.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: Self-management is considered important in people with pulmonary fibrosis (PF);however, components of self-management that are relevant to PF are not well defined. This study aimed to identify the common self-management components used in PF. Method(s): A scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework database (doi: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EUZ6S). A systematic search was conducted on August 16, 2022, using five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials). Search results were screened and studies were included if they (i) described any educational, behavioural and support components that aimed at facilitating self-management;(ii) involved adults with PF;and (iii) employed quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods. Two researchers performed record screening and data extraction independently followed by discussions of discrepancies. Result(s): Of the 27081 records screened, 87 studies were included (39% observational studies, 26% randomised controlled trials). The most common self-management components were patient education (78%), information or support for managing physical symptoms (66%) and enhancing psychosocial wellbeing (54%). Majority of the included studies (71%) were rehabilitation programs with evidence of self-management training such as home exercise program and breathing training. Other studies included palliative care programs consisting of components such as patient education and care goal setting (12%), support programs for managing medication (4%), home-based self-monitoring training (4%), disease management programs (4%), mindfulness-focused stress reduction program (1%), telemedicine service delivered during the COVID-19 outbreak that included strategies to prevent infections and self-monitoring of clinical parameters (1%) and PF-specific educational and support website (1%). Over half of the interventions were provided by a multidisciplinary team. Conclusion(s): This review identified the common components used to promote self-management in PF. These findings help to guide the development of optimal interventions to support self-management in PF.
ABSTRACT
Risk factors for severe COVID-19 are also associated with periodontitis. They are smoking, older age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the study was to select and analyze publications that consider a possible relationship between inflammatory periodontal diseases and the severity of COVID-19. Material and methods. The search for publications by the key words was conducted using the electronic databases: Cochrane Library;MEDLINE, eLIBRARY for systematic review. We selected 94 publications, the systematic review included 10 scientific articles presenting the results of randomized trials. Results. The results of the analysis showed the connection between COVID-19 severity and inflammatory periodontal diseases presence. In the patients with severe COVID-19 on the background of periodontitis it was established a high risk for artificial lung ventilation prescription. The course of COVID-19 is possibly depending on high expression of ACE2 receptors in oral mucosal cells and aspiration of pathogenic bacteria from periodontal tissues with saliva on the background of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. The bacterial etiology of periodontitis plays important role of an immunological trigger that causes hyperreaction of humoral and cellular immunity, NETosis activation and NLRP3 inflammation. Conclusion. The presence of periodontitis in patients with overweight and obesity, DM or hypertension may be associated with severe COVID-19 course, possible development of complications and pneumonia.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2023. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 is a public health emergency of international concern. Clinicians are likely to adopt various antithrombotic strategies to prevent embolic events, but the optimal antithrombotic strategy remains uncertain. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate various antithrombotic strategies comprehensively. Method(s): We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE and Clinical trials. gov to screen trials comparing different antithrombotic strategies. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes include major thrombotic event, major bleeding and in-hospital mortality, etc. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We successively performed traditional pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis using R v4.2.1 software. Result(s): Twenty-six eligible randomized controlled trials were included, giving a total of 35 paired comparisons with 32,041 patients randomized to 7 antithrombotic strategies. In comparison to standard of care (SoC) strategy, therapeutic anticoagulation (TA) (RR 0.36, 95% CrI 0.13-0.86) and prophylactic anticoagulation (PA) (RR 0.35, 95% CrI 0.12-0.85) strategy significantly reduced the mortality of COVID-19 patients (Fig. 1). The antiplatelet (AP) strategy was associated with high risk of major bleeding when compared with SoC strategy (RR 2.5, 95% CrI 1.1-8.9), and the TA (RR 0.43, 95% CrI 0.17-0.98), PA (RR 0.27, 95% CrI 0.10-0.63) and PA with Fibrinolytic agents (FA) strategy (RR 0.12, 95% CrI 0.01-0.81) was associated with low risk of major thrombotic event. Conclusion(s): This network meta-analysis indicates that the TA and PA strategies probably reduce mortality and confer other important benefits in COVID-19 patients. These findings provide guidance on how to choose optimal antithrombotic strategies for COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The rapid spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which causes a serious threat to both human health and the global economy, is primarily linked to the overuse and misuse of antibacterial drugs. The AMR crisis is significantly impacted by the use of antibacterial drugs in primary care (1). Within these settings, oral antibacterial drugs are considered one of the most frequently prescribed group of medicines. It has been claimed that within primary care, the proportion of antibacterial drug prescribing is higher outside the regular working hours (out-of-hours (OOH) services) compared to in-hours (IH) services (2). Aim(s): To identify the existing body of literature around oral antibacterial drug prescribing within primary care OOH services. Method(s): The scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute manual and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR. Seven electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched, and the results were screened against pre-defined eligibility criteria. Original and secondary analysis studies that addressed oral antibacterial prescribing in OOH primary care and were published in English were included. Titles and s were independently screened by three reviewers. A pre-piloted extraction form was used to extract relevant data. A narrative synthesis approach was used to summarise the results. Result(s): The initial search yielded 834 records. Upon screening, 28 publications fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Included studies originated from nine high-income countries, with the most frequent being the United Kingdom (six studies, 21.4%) followed by Belgium (five studies, 17.9%). Literature on antibacterial prescribing in OOH services was mostly from quantitative studies (23 studies, 82.14%), with only a few employing a qualitative design (five studies, 17.86%). Different themes and sub-themes were identified across these studies. The majority discussed antibacterial prescribing data in terms of the commonly prescribed medications and/or associated conditions. Eleven studies provided a comparison between IH and OOH settings. Seven studies reported the trends of prescribing over time;of these, three explored prescribing trends before and during COVID-19. The impact of intervention implementation on prescribing was investigated in two studies, an educational intervention in one study and the use of an interactive booklet in the other study. Four studies assessed the quality/appropriateness of prescribing either by adherence to guidelines or antibiotic prescribing quality indicators. Limited studies explored prescribing predictors and patients' expectations and satisfaction with OOH services. In contrast, qualitative studies focussed more on exploring prescribers' experiences, perspectives, behaviours, and the challenges they face during consultations within OOH settings which may influence their decision-making process. Of these, one study explored why patients consult OOH services and how they communicate their problems. Conclusion(s): This review shows the key areas around oral antibacterial prescribing in primary care OOH services. While there is a satisfactory number of published articles covering various areas within OOH, the use of different approaches to OOH across countries may confound the comparison of practice. A strength of this work is using three reviewers to screen identified records independently. Further research is needed to provide a better understanding of current practice in these settings and how it may be contributing to AMR.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a chronically stressful work environment for healthcare workers, increasing the negative psychological effects experienced. Aim(s): The authors of this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on frontline healthcare workers' mental health, using various psychological outcomes. Method(s): A systematic literature search was conducted up until June 30th, 2022 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Dissertations and Theses. Result(s): This meta-analysis includes 22 cross-sectional studies with a total of 32,690 participants. Anxiety (ES = 0.23, CI: [0.18, 0.28]), depression (ES = 0.17, CI: [0.10, 0.24]), PTSD (ES = 0.28, CI: [0.08, 0.48]), and stress (ES = 0.35, CI: [0.17, 0.53]) was significantly prevalent among frontline healthcare workers. Conclusion(s): Our results suggested that European healthcare workers were experiencing high psychological symptoms associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The monitoring of their psychological symptoms, preventative interventions, and treatments should be implemented to prevent, reduce, and treat the worsening of their mental health.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Semmelweis University, Institute of Mental Health, Budapest.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, which was first discovered in Wuhan, China. The disease has grown into a global pandemic causing mild to moderate symptoms in most people. The disease can also exhibit serious illnesses, especially for patients with other chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, or cancer. In such cases of severe illness, high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has been used to provide oxygenation to COVID-19 patients. However, the efficiency of HFNO remains uncertain, prompting the conduction of this systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapy. A thorough search for relevant and original articles was carried out on five electronic databases, including ScienceDirect, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. No time limitation was placed during the search as it included all the articles related to COVID-19 from 2019 to 2022. The search strategy utilized in this systematic review yielded 504 articles, of which only 10 met the eligibility criteria and were included. Our meta-analysis reveals that HFNO success rate was higher than HFNO failure rates (0.52 (95% CI;0.47, 0.56) and 0.48 (95% CI;0.44, 0.53), respectively), however, the difference was statistically insignificant. HFNO was associated with a significant decrease in mortality and intubation rates (0.28 (95% CI;0.19, 0.39) and 0.28 (95% CI;0.18, 0.41), respectively). Our statistical analysis has shown that significantly lower ROX index (5.07 +/- 1.66, p = 0.028) and PaO2/FiO2 (100 +/- 27.51, p = 0.031) are associated with HFNO failure, while a significantly lower respiratory rate (RR) (23.17 +/- 4.167, p = 0.006) is associated with HFNO success. No statistically significant difference was observed in SpO2/FiO2 ratio between the HFNO success and failure groups (154.23 +/- 42.74 vs. 124.025 +/- 28.50, p = 0.62, respectively). Based on the results from our meta-analysis, the success or failure of HFNO in treating COVID-19 adult patients remains uncertain. However, HFNO has been shown to be an effective treatment in reducing mortality and intubation rates. Therefore, HFNO can be recommended for COVID-19 patients but with close monitoring and should be carried out by experienced healthcare workers.Copyright © 2023 The Authors
ABSTRACT
Aim: To elucidate the factors that influence beta-lactam pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability in infective endocarditis (IE) and to examine optimal PK/PD target parameters for therapy. Background(s): Beta-lactam antibiotics are the mainstay of therapy for most bacterial causes of IE. Traditionally considered as agents with a broad therapeutic index there has been increasing recognition that standard doses may be subtherapeutic or toxic in critically ill patients. Optimising therapy for efficacy requires an established PK/PD target associated with clinical and microbiological cure. Method(s): Clinical and laboratory in vivo animal or human studies examining PK and/or PD of beta-lactam antibiotics in IE were eligible. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Registry were searched using defined terms. Two authors reviewed s and full texts using Covidence software. Result(s): 62 articles were selected for review and synthesis. We identified 45 animal studies investigating the broad categories of beta-lactam diffusion into vegetations, PK/PD determinants of outcome, mode of antibiotic delivery and synergistic impact of agents. 17 human case studies/series totalling 347 participants reported antibiotic serum concentrations and clinical outcomes. Findings generally supported the importance of time-dependent killing for beta-lactams but heterogeneous data limited the determination of an optimal PK/PD target for IE treatment. Conclusion(s): Beta-lactam PK and PD in endocarditis is variable and specific to the particular antibiotic-organism combination. Timedependent killing is important, consistent with non-endocarditis studies, but there is little agreement on optimal drug exposure. Clinical studies examining various PK/PD targets in endocarditis patients are required to further inform drug selection and dosing.Copyright © 2023 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The respiratory tract infections (RTIs), including pneumonia, influenza and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), are the leading cause of hospitalization and mortality worldwide, contributing to elevated healthcare and societal costs. There is conflicting evidences about the effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on the susceptibility of RTIs. Method(s): Systematic review of interventional and observational studies that reported use of ACEI or/and ARB on incidence of pneumonia or influenza or COVID-19. Searching was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), including the Cochrane Library until April 2022, and references of retrieved relevant articles. We assessed the quality of included studies by using Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool for Randomized Controlled Trials and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. DerSimonian Laird random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effects for the incidence of pneumonia, influenza and COVID-19. Subgroup analyses were carried according to baseline morbidities (hypertension or cardiovascular diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and other non-communicable diseases). Pooled estimates of odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed, and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I2 metrics, with two tailed P values. Result(s): 73 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 38 studies assessed the odds of pneumonia, 32 studies assessed Covid-19 and 3 studies assessed influenza. The quality of included studies was moderate. Use of ACEIs was associated with a significantly reduced odds of pneumonia (23 studies: OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85;I2=76.8%), of COVID-19 (24 studies: OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.92;I2=81.9%) and influenza (3 studies: OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.98, I2=97.7%), compared with control treatment. Use of ARBs was also associated with reduced odds of COVID-19 (25 studies: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.97;I2=91.9%), but not with odds of pneumonia or influenza. These findings remain consistent in the community population, patients with history of cerebrovascular diseases or cardiovascular diseases, but not in those with CKD, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Conclusion(s): The current evidence favours a putative protective role of ACEIs, not ARB in odds of pneumonia, COVID-19 and influenza. Patient populations that may benefit most are those within the community, history of cerebrovascular diseases and cardiovascular diseases. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023